<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Angel Blog Reviews &#187; offline-access</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.claimangels.com/tag/offline-access/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.claimangels.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:28:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Vanity Apps: The Next Big Thing For the iPhone?</title>
		<link>http://www.claimangels.com/social-media/vanity-apps-the-next-big-thing-for-the-iphone</link>
		<comments>http://www.claimangels.com/social-media/vanity-apps-the-next-big-thing-for-the-iphone#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 22:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cgseo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apps-continues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flickr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[friends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[odiogo-apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[offline-access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ouriel-ohayon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personalized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[potential-users]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trends]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.claimangels.com/uncategorized/vanity-apps-the-next-big-thing-for-the-iphone/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Thanks to the recent proliferation of do-it-yourself iPhone app services, the next big thing in Apple's App Store might just be vanity apps. Take, for example, Appsfire's Ouriel Ohayon, who just announced the launch of his own iPhone app. Ohayon used Odiogo Apps to create this personalized app. Odiogo , which mostly focuses on providing text-to-speech services for news sites and blogs, allows users to add RSS feeds, Twitter updates and photos from Flickr to its apps. Sponsor Odiogo's apps also feature the company's text-to-speech services, offline access and advertising support. For now, though, potential users still have to contact the company's sales department to get their own apps and the price of these customized apps isn't clear. More Clutter or a Great Opportunity? As the barrier of entry for creating customized iPhone apps continues to fall, chances are that we will see more and more vanity apps in the App Store. On the one hand, this could clutter the store with relatively useless apps. On the other hand, it could also provide a new source of income for independent bloggers who could use the apps to sell more advertising inventory or even charge a small fee for the app itself. Even bloggers with a small fanbase could reap the benefits of having their own iPhone apps. The question, however, is if users are actually interested in installing a single-purpose iPhone app that only gives them access to the content of one blogger. In the end, these apps are less flexible than a good mobile RSS reader. Apps like this probably make more sense for large multi-author blogs that publish a lot of content every day. On the other hand, the idea of being able to point their friends to their iPhone apps will surely prove to be irresistible for many people. Discuss ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Thanks to the recent proliferation of do-it-yourself iPhone app services, the next big thing in Apple's App Store might just be vanity apps. Take, for example, Appsfire's Ouriel Ohayon, who just announced the launch of his own iPhone app. Ohayon used Odiogo Apps to create this personalized app. Odiogo , which mostly focuses on providing text-to-speech services for news sites and blogs, allows users to add RSS feeds, Twitter updates and photos from Flickr to its apps. Sponsor Odiogo's apps also feature the company's text-to-speech services, offline access and advertising support. For now, though, potential users still have to contact the company's sales department to get their own apps and the price of these customized apps isn't clear. More Clutter or a Great Opportunity? As the barrier of entry for creating customized iPhone apps continues to fall, chances are that we will see more and more vanity apps in the App Store. On the one hand, this could clutter the store with relatively useless apps. On the other hand, it could also provide a new source of income for independent bloggers who could use the apps to sell more advertising inventory or even charge a small fee for the app itself. Even bloggers with a small fanbase could reap the benefits of having their own iPhone apps. The question, however, is if users are actually interested in installing a single-purpose iPhone app that only gives them access to the content of one blogger. In the end, these apps are less flexible than a good mobile RSS reader. Apps like this probably make more sense for large multi-author blogs that publish a lot of content every day. On the other hand, the idea of being able to point their friends to their iPhone apps will surely prove to be irresistible for many people. Discuss </p>
<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/odiogo_logo_dec09.png" title="Vanity Apps: The Next Big Thing For the iPhone?" alt="odiogo logo dec09 Vanity Apps: The Next Big Thing For the iPhone?" /></p>
<p>The rest is here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/readwriteweb/~3/0nuncNCkBeE/are_vanity_apps_the_next_big_thing_for_the_iphone.php" title="Vanity Apps: The Next Big Thing For the iPhone?">Vanity Apps: The Next Big Thing For the iPhone?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.claimangels.com/social-media/vanity-apps-the-next-big-thing-for-the-iphone/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Dumps Gears for HTML5</title>
		<link>http://www.claimangels.com/social-media/google-dumps-gears-for-html5</link>
		<comments>http://www.claimangels.com/social-media/google-dumps-gears-for-html5#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 03:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[announcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[devices-running]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gears]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[offline-access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relationship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[though-the-spec]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.claimangels.com/uncategorized/google-dumps-gears-for-html5/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ It's official: Google is ditching its homegrown Gears offline web app API in favor of backing HTML5 for the win. Now that the Chrome browser is becoming available for Mac, and the Snow Leopard OS doesn't play nicely with Gears, Google has decided to trash the whole works and wait for HTML5, even though the spec isn't yet ready and isn't supported by commercially available browsers. Oh, the humanity... or rather, the machinery. Sponsor In the mists of time, back when Gears first launched , we wrote, "We've written many times before about the need for offline web app access... And guess who is most at risk with this announcement? Yes, Microsoft. Google after all has many of the top 'best of breed' web apps now." This was before Google's Chrome browser had hit the scene, and the Gears project was a collaborative effort between Goog, Opera, and Mozilla. But in our coverage of last year's Google I/O conference, we wrote of Gears, "We question whether offline access is even necessary. After all... in today's world, you're never too far from an internet connection. We concluded that offline access is important now, but less important with each passing day." Not only could Gears be used to take online data offline; Google had more in store for Gears users. A few short months later, Google announced a geolocation API for mobile devices running Gears. We wrote, "We think that location-aware software is going to be one of the most interesting markets to watch in the near future and as as location-aware devices become more ubiquitous, we will hopefully see a lot of new and innovative services make use of them." But the party ended with Snow Leopard's release. A change in the newest Mac OS prevents Gears from running on newer Mac computers. Whether or not the relationship is one of causation or mere correlation, Google is now abandoning Gears. As one Google rep told the L.A. Times , "We are excited that much of the technology in Gears, including offline support and geolocation APIs, are being incorporated into the HTML5 spec as an open standard supported across browsers, and see that as the logical next step for developers looking to include these features in their websites." Believe us Google, no one is looking forward to the cross-browser, cross-OS implementation of HTML5 as much as we are. Discuss ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> It's official: Google is ditching its homegrown Gears offline web app API in favor of backing HTML5 for the win. Now that the Chrome browser is becoming available for Mac, and the Snow Leopard OS doesn't play nicely with Gears, Google has decided to trash the whole works and wait for HTML5, even though the spec isn't yet ready and isn't supported by commercially available browsers. Oh, the humanity... or rather, the machinery. Sponsor In the mists of time, back when Gears first launched , we wrote, "We've written many times before about the need for offline web app access... And guess who is most at risk with this announcement? Yes, Microsoft. Google after all has many of the top 'best of breed' web apps now." This was before Google's Chrome browser had hit the scene, and the Gears project was a collaborative effort between Goog, Opera, and Mozilla. But in our coverage of last year's Google I/O conference, we wrote of Gears, "We question whether offline access is even necessary. After all... in today's world, you're never too far from an internet connection. We concluded that offline access is important now, but less important with each passing day." Not only could Gears be used to take online data offline; Google had more in store for Gears users. A few short months later, Google announced a geolocation API for mobile devices running Gears. We wrote, "We think that location-aware software is going to be one of the most interesting markets to watch in the near future and as as location-aware devices become more ubiquitous, we will hopefully see a lot of new and innovative services make use of them." But the party ended with Snow Leopard's release. A change in the newest Mac OS prevents Gears from running on newer Mac computers. Whether or not the relationship is one of causation or mere correlation, Google is now abandoning Gears. As one Google rep told the L.A. Times , "We are excited that much of the technology in Gears, including offline support and geolocation APIs, are being incorporated into the HTML5 spec as an open standard supported across browsers, and see that as the logical next step for developers looking to include these features in their websites." Believe us Google, no one is looking forward to the cross-browser, cross-OS implementation of HTML5 as much as we are. Discuss </p>
<p><img src="http://www.claimangels.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/c56f39ad64gears.jpg-142x150.jpg" title="Google Dumps Gears for HTML5" alt="c56f39ad64gears.jpg 142x150 Google Dumps Gears for HTML5" /></p>
<p>View post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/readwriteweb/~3/rNw6wkvbkxo/google_dumps_gears_for_html5.php" title="Google Dumps Gears for HTML5">Google Dumps Gears for HTML5</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.claimangels.com/social-media/google-dumps-gears-for-html5/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

